The 2025 contest is now accepting entries. Contest is open to high school aged students in the Cowichan Valley and Ganges areas.
Contestants in this year’s MC Poetry & Spoken Word Competition must submit a video presentation of an original piece of poetry (1-5 minutes long) along with a written copy of the work and a short biography. Submissions can be made via the Google Form linked on the previous page (requires Google sign-in).
The contest is open to all topics; however, vulgar, homophobic, sexist, racist, and ableist content will not be tolerated. Any plagiarized or solely AI-produced content will result in disqualification.
The following is a copy of the criteria our panel of judges will be using to score each submission.
Updated January 2025
Originality: Subject matter is fresh and unique.
(1=derivative; 5=novel)
Relevance: Subject matter is topical and relevant.
(1=irrelevant, trivial; 5=pertinent, relatable)
Thought Provoking: Poem excites and makes the viewer/reader think and reflect.
(1=uninspiring; 5=captivating, inspiring)
Insightful: Poem offers a meaningful perspective.
(1=vapid, shallow, uniformed; 5=astute, thoughtful, informed)
Theme: Poem has a clear, identifiable message or feeling.
(1=unclear, confusing; 5=concise and pointed)
Structure: The poem’s structure & language are intentional and effective.
(1=lack of care; 10=deliberate, effective)
Creative Language: The poem employs creative and engaging vocabulary, rhetoric, and literary devices.
(1=plain, unimaginative; 10=artistic, inventive, stimulating)
Descriptive Language / Imagery: The poem paints vivid pictures with its words and literary devices.
(1=no descriptive language; 10=clear, evocative imagery)
The MC Clause – Spelling: We expect polished spelling, as Michael would have intended. 1 point will be deducted for any obvious, unintentional spelling errors.
(up to -5 points; -1 point per error)
Rhythm: The poem has good rhythm and movement which complements the subject matter. This includes line/stanza breaks, breaths, pauses, cadence, and the rise and fall of emphasis throughout the poem.
(1=inconsistent, jarring; 10=consistent, fluid, effective)
Sound: The poem uses sound effectively. This might include sound devices such as rhyme, alliteration, and dissonance.
(1=flat, ineffective; 10=thoughtful, expressive, effective)
Symbolism / Figurative Language: The poem engages the reader with creative figurative language, including original imagery, symbolism, and other devices.
(1=none; 10=inventive, effective devices employed)
Creativity: The video presentation has strong visual interest and creative direction, including attention to setting.
(1=lacks creativity, dull; 10=highly creative, captivating)
Production: The video is technically well-executed in terms of lighting, sound, and editing.
(1=dimly lit, hard to hear, lacks editing; 5=well lit, enunciated, appropriate volume, polished)
Originality: The video presentation is overall original with unique or atypical elements.
(1=plain, derivative; 5=unique, conceptual)
Voice / Passion: The speaker demonstrates voice clarity and passion for the poem and subject.
(1=cold, indifferent; 5=authentic, believable, spirited)
Each submission (both video and written works) will be judged on the above criteria by our panel of qualified judges on the above noted scales. Remember that this is a visual poetry contest. Visual content must work to enhance the experience of the poem.
The highest possible score is 110 points. The three highest scoring contestants will win cash prizes!